![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:41 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
Pretty much my ideal Disco. The price seems right, it has a clean Carfax, under 100k, and the fact that the dealer has 217 photos of it doesn’t hurt either.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:42 |
|
http://www.saabclassic.net/1999_Land%20Rover_Discovery_Cream%20Ridge_NJ_7442650.veh#
In case Kinja eats the link.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:47 |
|
Do it, how bad can it be?
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:52 |
|
I feel like that’s a question that one should never put to a Land Rover.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:52 |
|
Whats your tolerance towards unexpected repairs? Not saying its a timebomb, but Its more than likely there will be some hands on time with it...which is sold as a perk by those crazy people called Land Rover enthusiasts.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:53 |
|
Well...do you have hope of getting your money back out of it later?
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:54 |
|
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:54 |
|
I currently DD a Jag whose yearly repairs and maintenance exceeds its bluebook, so... no.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:55 |
|
The best four by four by
four thousand hours out of commission
far
. Yeah, far, that’s the ticket! Anyway, beautiful car. Lovely plumage.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:55 |
|
Okay-ish. With gas mileage like that and my own 70 mile roundtrip commute, I don’t think it would ever be a daily driver.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:56 |
|
Why would they take a million photos of a bad car? It must be a good car.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:57 |
|
On the plus side it is a Discovery II so that helps, but still it’s a British car that’s old enough to vote.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 14:58 |
|
Then it’s probably a great idea! Financially, it’s a terrible idea. Howeer, if you can walk away from it if when it breaks and you will have fun along the way then it’s probably worth it! People spend a lot more on much more mundane automobiles.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:00 |
|
I’m trying to rationalize it that way too. I’m sort of genuinely impressed that they put it up on a lift and photographed the underbody.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:08 |
|
Let’s see...17 years old, average American mileage is 15k per year, car has 100k on it. That’s 10 years and 4 months in the shop.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:13 |
|
My main worry is that the Carfax shows it at 88313k in 2011 and it has 88366.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:15 |
|
I never really trust Carfax, but the possibility that the thing has been “mothballed” is definitely real. I sold a ton of these (lightly used) in the early 2000s, it was generally considered a bad idea. With just 20k on the odometer and 3 years old, they were half of original sticker price. Even if you’re handy, some of the parts still cost a fortune. Our on-site shop guys hated them with a passion. They said it made early 2000s Audi and Jaguar look reliable.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:22 |
|
No you should not buy it because I want it.
Also, this guy seems on a mission to sell as many northwestern-y cars as possible to New Jersey.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:34 |
|
In all fairness, my early 2000s Jag is kind of reliable.
That’s a good point. I would definitely have to run the idea by my mechanic before thinking seriously about it.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:36 |
|
Save me from myself, please
The carfax on this one says it was bought at auction in Illinois, so you’re not far off.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:37 |
|
That may have been the most New York/New Jersey statement I have ever seen.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 15:54 |
|
How bad, you say?
![]() 01/26/2017 at 17:55 |
|
I had a ‘99 Disco. That is not a ‘99 Disco. That is a ‘98 Disco.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 18:02 |
|
Really? They have a photo of the door sticker and it has a manufacturing date of June ‘98.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 18:24 |
|
Most thoroughly photographed ad I’ve ever seen, I’d consider buying sight unseen if I was in the market
![]() 01/26/2017 at 23:08 |
|
99 was a split year, some D1's and some D2's. This is a 99.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 23:10 |
|
Nope, that’s a D1. Note the door handles and low mounted taillights in comparison to a D2.
![]() 01/26/2017 at 23:14 |
|
Too much money.
Will likely need head gaskets, front cover gasket, water pump, hoses, transfer case reseal, panhard bushings, tie rods/drag link.
They’re actually not too hard to work on, simple to diagnose, and parts can be found for reasonable prices new and used.
It’s a 99 which was a pretty good year. But they’re still asking twice what it’s worth, IMO.
![]() 01/27/2017 at 12:57 |
|
Change to the Disco II was a middle model year change in the US. So DI first have the year and DII the second.
![]() 01/27/2017 at 13:02 |
|
If your not able to do ALL the work in it yourself our you are loaded, I wouldn’t buy one. I have a 2001 DII that I have had for 10 years but I do all the work on it including replacing the head gaskets. It also gets bad mileage, I think I am getting around 14 MPG and it runs premium. It doesn’t get driven daily.
![]() 01/27/2017 at 15:16 |
|
Sigh. :(
![]() 01/27/2017 at 16:00 |
|
a day late on this, but solid CP
![]() 01/30/2017 at 14:51 |
|
Ah, didn’t know that we got the split year in the US. Learn something new everyday! Good luck with your Rover if you wound up getting it!